Z User
e45b68bb8b
Real IMAP connection via imapflow library: - Connects to IMAP server (IMAPFlow, TLS on port 993) - Fetches recent messages (configurable limit, default 20) - Extracts: from, fromEmail, subject, date, snippet (200 chars) - Thread-to-contact matching (PRD §6.1): 1. Match sender email against persons table 2. If no person match, extract domain and match against company.website 3. Returns matchedCompany + matchedPerson for each email - Audit-logged (action: crm.mailsync:imap) - Zod validated (host, port, user, password, folder, limit) - 502 on IMAP connection failure with detail - 400 on validation failure Tested: invalid creds → 502 'IMAP connection failed', missing host → 400
89 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
89 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
Executable File
---
|
||
name: enterprise
|
||
description: Clean, high-contrast enterprise design for data-driven workflows with intuitive drag-and-drop patterns and structured layouts.
|
||
license: MIT
|
||
metadata:
|
||
author: typeui.sh
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_START -->
|
||
# Enterprise Design System Skill (Universal)
|
||
|
||
## Mission
|
||
You are an expert design-system guideline author for Enterprise.
|
||
Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.
|
||
|
||
## Brand
|
||
Everything you need – data, apps, and AI in an intuitive drag and drop interface to automate your workflows.
|
||
|
||
## Style Foundations
|
||
- Visual style: clean, high-contrast, enterprise
|
||
- Typography scale: desktop-first expressive scale | Fonts: primary=Ubuntu, display=Oswald, mono=Ubuntu Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
|
||
- Color palette: primary, success, warning, danger | Tokens: primary=#072C2C, secondary=#FF5F03, success=#16A34A, warning=#D97706, danger=#DC2626, surface=#EDEADE, text=#111827
|
||
- Spacing scale: comfortable density mode
|
||
|
||
- patterns
|
||
- images
|
||
|
||
## Accessibility
|
||
WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states
|
||
|
||
## Writing Tone
|
||
confident, helpful, friendly, professional
|
||
|
||
## Rules: Do
|
||
- prefer semantic tokens over raw values
|
||
- preserve visual hierarchy
|
||
- keep interaction states explicit
|
||
|
||
## Rules: Don't
|
||
- avoid low contrast text
|
||
- avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
|
||
- avoid decorative motion without purpose
|
||
- avoid ambiguous labels
|
||
- avoid mixing multiple visual metaphors
|
||
- avoid inaccessible hit areas
|
||
|
||
## Expected Behavior
|
||
- Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
|
||
- When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
|
||
- Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
|
||
- Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.
|
||
|
||
## Guideline Authoring Workflow
|
||
1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
|
||
2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
|
||
3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
|
||
4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
|
||
5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
|
||
6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.
|
||
|
||
## Required Output Structure
|
||
When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:
|
||
- Context and goals
|
||
- Design tokens and foundations
|
||
- Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
|
||
- Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
|
||
- Content and tone standards with examples
|
||
- Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
|
||
- QA checklist
|
||
|
||
## Component Rule Expectations
|
||
- Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
|
||
- Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
|
||
- State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
|
||
- Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).
|
||
|
||
## Quality Gates
|
||
- No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
|
||
- Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
|
||
- Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
|
||
- Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.
|
||
|
||
## Example Constraint Language
|
||
- Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
|
||
- Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
|
||
- If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.
|
||
|
||
<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_END -->
|