Files
AOS/skills/interview-designer/templates/interview_guide_template.md
T
Z User e45b68bb8b feat: IMAP mail sync with thread-to-contact matching (PRD §6.1)
Real IMAP connection via imapflow library:
- Connects to IMAP server (IMAPFlow, TLS on port 993)
- Fetches recent messages (configurable limit, default 20)
- Extracts: from, fromEmail, subject, date, snippet (200 chars)
- Thread-to-contact matching (PRD §6.1):
  1. Match sender email against persons table
  2. If no person match, extract domain and match against company.website
  3. Returns matchedCompany + matchedPerson for each email
- Audit-logged (action: crm.mailsync:imap)
- Zod validated (host, port, user, password, folder, limit)
- 502 on IMAP connection failure with detail
- 400 on validation failure

Tested: invalid creds → 502 'IMAP connection failed', missing host → 400
2026-10-27 22:50:50 +00:00

1.7 KiB
Executable File

{Candidate_Name}_Targeted_Interview_Guide

Important

Planning Context: Based on war room simulation with {Expert_List}. Objective: Verify competency match (Step 1), gather evidence on resume concerns (Step 2), project future performance (Step 3).


1. Competency Scorecard

Before looking at the resume, THIS is what success looks like.

  • Mission (One-sentence mission): ...
  • Outcomes (12-month must-achieve results):
    1. ...
    2. ...
  • Core Competencies:
    • {Competency 1}: {Description}
    • {Competency 2}: {Description}

2. Forensic Resume Scan

Scan resume against Scorecard, looking for Gaps (concerns) and Evidence (matches).

🔴 Red Flags (Concerns/Gaps)

  • {Concern 1}: ...
    • Expert Challenge: ...
  • {Concern 2}: ...

🟢 Green Signals (Highlights/Matches)

  • {Highlight 1}: ...
    • Evidence: ...

3. Interview Battle Scripts

Part A: Pressure Validation (Past Performance)

Forensic STAR follow-ups designed for Red Flags.

Q1 (targeting {Concern 1}):

  • The Setup: "{Question...}"
  • The Drill: "{Follow-up...}"

Part B: Future Projection (Future Scenario)

Performance simulations designed for Outcomes.

Q2 (targeting Outcome 1):

  • Scenario: "{Set up a specific challenge highly relevant to future work...}"
  • Question: "If this is the situation you face in your first week, how would you handle it?"
  • Bar Raiser: "{What would an A Player do?}" vs "{What would a B Player do?}"

4. Decision Matrix

Dimension No Hire (Kill) HIRE (Pass)
Integrity ... ...
Competency Match ... ...