feat: IMAP mail sync with thread-to-contact matching (PRD §6.1)

Real IMAP connection via imapflow library:
- Connects to IMAP server (IMAPFlow, TLS on port 993)
- Fetches recent messages (configurable limit, default 20)
- Extracts: from, fromEmail, subject, date, snippet (200 chars)
- Thread-to-contact matching (PRD §6.1):
  1. Match sender email against persons table
  2. If no person match, extract domain and match against company.website
  3. Returns matchedCompany + matchedPerson for each email
- Audit-logged (action: crm.mailsync:imap)
- Zod validated (host, port, user, password, folder, limit)
- 502 on IMAP connection failure with detail
- 400 on validation failure

Tested: invalid creds → 502 'IMAP connection failed', missing host → 400

skills/interview-designer/templates/interview_guide_template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# {Candidate_Name}_Targeted_Interview_Guide
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> **Planning Context**: Based on war room simulation with {Expert_List}.
+> **Objective**: Verify competency match (Step 1), gather evidence on resume concerns (Step 2), project future performance (Step 3).
+
+---
+
+## 1. Competency Scorecard
+
+*Before looking at the resume, THIS is what success looks like.*
+
+*   **Mission (One-sentence mission)**: ...
+*   **Outcomes (12-month must-achieve results)**:
+    1.  ...
+    2.  ...
+*   **Core Competencies**:
+    *   **{Competency 1}**: {Description}
+    *   **{Competency 2}**: {Description}
+
+---
+
+## 2. Forensic Resume Scan
+
+*Scan resume against Scorecard, looking for Gaps (concerns) and Evidence (matches).*
+
+### 🔴 Red Flags (Concerns/Gaps)
+*   **{Concern 1}**: ...
+    *   *Expert Challenge*: ...
+*   **{Concern 2}**: ...
+
+### 🟢 Green Signals (Highlights/Matches)
+*   **{Highlight 1}**: ...
+    *   *Evidence*: ...
+
+---
+
+## 3. Interview Battle Scripts
+
+### Part A: Pressure Validation (Past Performance)
+*Forensic STAR follow-ups designed for Red Flags.*
+
+**Q1 (targeting {Concern 1})**:
+*   **The Setup**: "{Question...}"
+*   **The Drill**: "{Follow-up...}"
+
+### Part B: Future Projection (Future Scenario)
+*Performance simulations designed for Outcomes.*
+
+**Q2 (targeting Outcome 1)**:
+*   **Scenario**: "{Set up a specific challenge highly relevant to future work...}"
+*   **Question**: "If this is the situation you face in your first week, how would you handle it?"
+*   **Bar Raiser**: "{What would an A Player do?}" vs "{What would a B Player do?}"
+
+---
+
+## 4. Decision Matrix
+
+| Dimension | No Hire (Kill) | HIRE (Pass) |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| **Integrity** | ... | ... |
+| **Competency Match** | ... | ... |